Premium

The man who rigged America's election maps

This lesson explores the controversial practice of gerrymandering in US elections, focusing on how district maps are manipulated to favor specific political parties. Students will learn about the techniques used and discuss the implications for democratic fairness and representat

C1 Practical English General Grammar Video
The man who rigged America's election maps
Photo by GeoJango Maps / Unsplash

Summary

This ESL lesson for C1 English students delves into the complex topic of election rigging through gerrymandering in the United States. Using an engaging video, students will explore how political maps are redrawn to manipulate election outcomes. The lesson aims to enhance students' understanding of political vocabulary, develop listening comprehension skills, and practice the Past Simple Passive voice in a relevant context. Through discussions, vocabulary exercises, and grammar practice, students will gain insight into the ethical implications of gerrymandering and develop their ability to articulate complex political issues in English.

Activities

  • A warm-up discussion about elections, political boundaries, and the concept of gerrymandering.
  • A listening comprehension exercise with a fill-in-the-blanks task based on a video about "The man who rigged America's election maps."
  • A key vocabulary matching activity focusing on political terms like district, census, manipulation, vote, and boundary.
  • A grammar focus section explaining and practicing the Past Simple Passive through a multiple-choice exercise.
  • A vocabulary in context exercise to reinforce the use of new political terms.
  • A grammar practice task requiring students to transform active voice sentences into the Past Simple Passive.
  • A speaking practice session where students debate the fairness of redistricting, applying learned vocabulary and grammar.
00:00:05 But in North Carolina, the election results were really weird.
00:00:09 These squares represent all the voters in North Carolina.
00:00:13 They were voting for these 13 seats in Congress.
00:00:16 About half voted for Republicans.
00:00:18 And about 48 percent voted for Democrats.
00:00:21 So you might think, of the 13 Congressional seats, maybe Democrats would've won 6 seats,
00:00:27 and Republicans would've won 7.
00:00:28 But no.
00:00:30 Democrats only won 3 of 13 seats β€” way less than half.
00:00:35 This imbalance was because North Carolina's Congressional districts had been "gerrymandered."
00:00:38 It means that these voters had been grouped into districts very strategically
00:00:44 with the goal of benefiting one party.
00:00:47 Gerrymandering has pretty much always happened in America.
00:00:50 That's because, every 10 years the political districts are redrawn.
00:00:55 And in most cases, those new lines get drawn
00:00:58 by whoever holds power in state governments at the time.
00:01:01 That's what happened in 2010.
00:01:03 Republicans won control of lots of state governments, and redrew the political lines to favor themselves.
00:01:08 And over the next few years, redistricting helped them hold onto almost all those states.
00:01:13 This shifted the balance of power.
00:01:16 And it turns out that behind a lot of this, was one guy.
00:01:29 This is Thomas Hofeller:
00:01:32 The mapmaker who helped Republicans gerrymander districts over the last decade.
00:01:36 When Hofeller died in 2018, his daughter found thousands of his emails and files, which she
00:01:41 shared with activists.
00:01:44 The files show that Tom Hoeffler’s fingerprints are all over the way America’s political
00:01:48 maps look today.
00:01:50 But North Carolina was his masterpiece.
00:01:53 And if you want to understand why gerrymandering is a such a big problem in the US,
00:01:57 that’s a good place to start.
00:02:01 The basics of gerrymandering are actually pretty simple.
00:02:05 If you're a Republican trying to keep power, you want to do two things.
00:02:09 First, "pack" as many Democratic voters as possible into a single district.
00:02:14 If you have a district where almost everyone votes Democrat, that means almost half of
00:02:19 those votes are basically wasted.
00:02:22 You can also "crack" big Democratic areas into separate districts β€” where there are
00:02:26 slightly more Republicans.
00:02:28 So even though an area has a lot of Democratic votes, they would actually lose in this district
00:02:33 and in this district.
00:02:35 These are the two elements of classic gerrymandering: Packing and cracking.
00:02:40 And Hoffeler employed these techniques masterfully in North Carolina.
00:02:45 In 2011 he was hired to redraw the state's political lines.
00:02:48 And for congressional districts, he came up with this map.
00:02:52 Now, I just want to focus in on District 12, this weird skinny shape.
00:02:57 In order to make sense of this shape, we have to look at another map.
00:03:01 This map shows the percentage of black people in each neighborhood.
00:03:04 The bluer areas are where more black people live.
00:03:07 Hofeller basically gathered up black people in Winston-Salem, Greensboro, and Charlotte
00:03:11 β€” and packed them into one district.
00:03:14 So that's how District 12 happened.
00:03:17 Hoeffler also did this with North Carolina’s state representatives and state senators.
00:03:22 For example here are the state senate districts.
00:03:25 Here, he packed Winston-Salem into one district.
00:03:29 And then packed Greensboro into its own district.
00:03:33 These new districts helped Republicans get a stranglehold on power in the North Carolina statehouse.
00:03:37 And over the next few years, they were able to pass crucial legislation.
00:03:41 A strict new voter ID law in North Carolina.
00:03:44 Which bathrooms transgender individuals can use in North Carolina.
00:03:50 In 2016 and 2017, federal courts ruled both of these maps were unconstitutional.
00:03:56 They said what North Carolina Republicans did wasn't just gerrymandering β€” it was
00:03:59 racial gerrymandering, done to deliberately dilute the political power of black people.
00:04:03 The courts said that the Republicans in the North Carolina statehouse now had to redraw
00:04:07 the lines without looking at racial demographics.
00:04:11 So they went back... to Tom Hofeller.
00:04:14 This time, Hofeller couldn't look at race.
00:04:16 Instead, he looked at which areas voted for Democrats and which areas voted for Republicans.
00:04:22 Instead of a racial gerrymander, it would be a partisan gerrymander.
00:04:26 Here's that map, using data from 2014.
00:04:29 The bluer an area, the more Democratic voters there are.
00:04:32 Now, if you zoom in here, to Greensboro, you can see one of the highest concentrations
00:04:36 of Democratic voters in the state.
00:04:39 Hoffeler drew a congressional district line to crack this community in half.
00:04:44 This meant Democrats here, were now the minority in their district.
00:04:47 And Democrats here were also the minority in their district.
00:04:51 Hoffeler employed these techniques all over the state to create North Carolina’s new
00:04:55 political districts.
00:04:56 And the first big test for these new maps would be the 2018 election.
00:05:01 Democrats were expected to turn out in droves.
00:05:04 Democrats are vying for a potential blue wave.
00:05:06 The wave that Republicans fear is going to wipe them out.
00:05:09 So, how did the maps do?
00:05:13 For state representatives, Democrats got 51 percent of the vote.
00:05:17 They won only 46 percent of seats.
00:05:22 For state senate, they received half the vote β€” and won just 42 percent of seats.
00:05:26 And for Congress?
00:05:28 You already know how that one turned out.
00:05:31 Democrats won nearly half the votes β€” but won only three out of 13 seats.
00:05:36 A year later, in 2019, the Supreme Court weighed in.
00:05:40 They said it was beyond their reach… that it wasn't their job to fix it.
00:05:45 All of this raised an existential question:
00:05:48 If Republicans could continue drawing the lines to stay in power, how could they ever
00:05:52 be elected out of office?
00:05:56 But the Supreme Court ruling left open the possibility for state courts to rule on partisan
00:06:02 gerrymandering.
00:06:03 And in September 2019, that's exactly what North Carolina's Supreme Court did.
00:06:08 The court found that partisan gerrymandering violated the state constitution.
00:06:12 In the court’s decision, it was Hofeller's files that helped prove that North Carolina
00:06:16 Republicans drew these lines with the clear intention of benefiting themselves.
00:06:20 Ultimately, the court said North Carolina Republicans had to redraw the state house
00:06:24 and state senate maps one more time.
00:06:27 This new map approved by North Carolina legislators is much less biased toward one party β€” even
00:06:32 though it took some extreme measures, and nearly a decade, to force politicians to draw
00:06:37 a fairer map.
00:06:39 In the last few years, the courts in several states, like Florida and Pennsylvania, have
00:06:43 made partisan gerrymandering much harder.
00:06:46 And now that's also the case in North Carolina.
00:06:50 Hofeller is gone now.
00:06:52 But in other states across the country, many maps he helped draw are still in use.
00:06:57 And while there's now a clearer strategy to challenge those maps in state courts...
00:07:02 … many voters are still, effectively, not choosing their representatives.
00:07:07 It’s like Hoeffler said:, the representatives are choosing the voters.
00:07:12 "... of course, redistricting is democracy at work.
00:07:17 Redistricting is like an election in reverse.
00:07:19 It's a great event."

Vocabulary focus

The vocabulary section introduces key terms related to electoral systems and political manipulation. Students will learn and practice words such as gerrymandered (to draw electoral districts to give one political party an unfair advantage), redrawn (to draw again, especially maps or boundaries), mapmaker, pack (to concentrate voters of one type into a single electoral district), crack (to spread voters of one type across many districts), unconstitutional, dilute (to make a quality or value weaker), partisan (biased in favor of a particular party), and violated. Terms from the matching activity like district, census, manipulation, vote, and boundary are also reinforced.

Grammar focus

This lesson concentrates on the Past Simple Passive voice. Students will review its structure: was/were + past participle.

The focus is on using the passive voice when the agent (the person or thing performing the action) is either unknown, unimportant, or when the action itself or the receiver of the action is more significant. This allows students to discuss past political actions and their consequences, emphasizing the events rather than necessarily the actors.

Would you like me to create a table of example sentences comparing the active voice to the Past Simple Passive for your students?


Related

Health science: Is exercise the best way to lose weight?
B2 Lifestyle Practical English General Grammar Psychology Video

Health science: Is exercise the best way to lose weight?

This lesson explores the scientific understanding that exercise alone is often ineffective for weight loss, emphasizing the primary role of diet and basal metabolism. It debunks common misconceptions about energy expenditure and introduces the concept of compensatory behaviors.

Premium
Culinary history: The global journey of dumplings
B2 Practical English Grammar Lifestyle Travel General Video

Culinary history: The global journey of dumplings

Explore the fascinating global history of dumplings, tracing their journey from ancient origins to diverse culinary adaptations worldwide. This lesson covers listening, vocabulary, and grammar focusing on the Past Simple Passive.

Premium
Sustainability: The high cost of fast fashion
B2 Practical English Business Lifestyle General Work Grammar Video

Sustainability: The high cost of fast fashion

This lesson explores the environmental and social impact of fast fashion. It delves into the concept of sustainability within the fashion industry and encourages discussion on consumer choices and corporate responsibilities.

Premium